全部

1·This essay explores its significance in conciliating the controversy between nominalism and empiricism, liberating our thoughts and marking the limits of man's cognition.

本文探讨了它在调和唯理论与经验论之间的争论、解放人类思想、划定人的认识界线的意义。

2·In the third part, the authors focus on finishing a Dialogue covers jurisprudence implication, and from the nominalism , State ratio to explain aspects of Dialogue.

在第三部分，本文着力整理《对话》涵盖的法理学意蕴，并将从“唯名论”、“国家理由”的方面来阐释《对话》。

3·The dissertation holds that possible worlds doctrines of extreme realism and extreme nominalism are both mistaken, and that the really feasible one should be moderate realism.

文章认为，极端实在论和极端唯名论的可能世界学说都是错误的，真正具有可行性的可能世界学说应是温和的实在论。